TBH neither vineyard looks to have that healthy bines but it could be the time of year and variety.
Whenever Organic farming comes up, too many people like to think of it as the polar opposite of non-organic, which they describe using terms like blitzed, drenched, devoid of life and dead.
While it is true that there are vineyards treated badly by growers focused on high yields with minimal effort, nearly all the vineyards which make the kind of wines we like are treated with respect and care. Some growers, for various reasons, choose to follow the Organic certification route but many prefer to follow other guidelines.
Copper Sulphate is the bugbear of organic viticulture because it is the only effective fungicide permitted against downy mildew, a very serious threat. People supporting organics may state that lower amounts are permitted for organic certification but the elephant in the room is that copper sulphate is the only thing they can use, so they have to use it. There are numerous modern, synthetic fungicides that are far more effective and have no known environmental downsides that are available to non-organic growers.
The organic promotion organisations have launched a culture war against the use of synthetic pesticides in order to frighten or persuade consumers that Organic produce is safer for their health. They have released and publicised loads of semi-scientific reports on pesticide residues detected (usually in amounts far below the safe limits) and linked those to potential or possible risks of cancer, Alzheimer's, Parkinson's, and various other neuro diseases. A jury in California was sufficiently influenced by such stories to find an agri-chemical company liable for a farm worker contracting cancer, ignoring the scientific evidence presented to the contrary. So now the organic lobbyists use that case to prove that synthetic pesticides cause cancer.
Going back to environmental issues and whether sticking to organic rules produces better fruit, and therefore wine. Organics prohibits any form of synthetic herbicide. They can use chemical weedkillers but it has to be something like vinegar or a salt, which are not very good for the soil.
The problem vignerons have, especially in dry regions where irrigation is not permitted under the AOP rules, is that it becomes more and more difficult to remove unwanted "weeds" growing under the vines. You'll often see a vineyard undergoing organic conversion which looks just as "clean" as before for the first couple of years but then perennial shrubs and pervasive plants start to take over. No inter-vine plough or mower can remove them so it comes down to doing it by hand. A wealthy grower, or one in a poor country, can afford to hire teams of people to dig and hoe the vine row but the majority of growers can't. So they become trapped in a system of increasing their wine prices to make up for the loss of yield.
We have all heard that lower yields equate to higher quality but this is only within a certain range, where th e high yields are causing uneven ripening of fruit. Once you are below that level, lower yields don't improve grape quality. My eyes start rolling when I hear growers talking about the merit of frighteningly low yields. I know because I have some vineyards like that. They have a lot of missing vines, old ones that are past their time and ones which harbour viruses. They also have low yields because they lose a lot of fruit to disease and insects, which does not make the remaining crop any better.
Ploughing the vineyard row is increasingly being seen as detrimental to the soil if it is only done to suppress weeds. Some soils can support a cover crop, which can be mowed, but some cannot because they are either too stony, too steep for tractors or just too dry. Different climates and different soil-types require different methods of management. Judicious use of weedkillers is one of those methods and the use of glyphosate should not be immediately linked to a bare vineyard where nothing else grows. (The vineyard in the right of the photo does not look like glyphosate to me, by the way).
All the points I'm making above are to point out the error in judging a grower or estate on their organic certification or even on the basis of a photo of the vineyard at one particular point in time.