- Location
- Europe
For me and I suspect for Cav it was the 31st win which that was the most significant
Sadly Eddy has not been quite so magnanimous!Cav very humble re. comparisons to Eddie Merckx: This to the BBC yesterday:
"It's just a number, you know, it doesn't put me on on a level with Eddy Merckx in terms of as a cyclist. I'm a sprinter... I don't think I can ever be compared to the greatest ever road cyclist of all time".
He's stating what's obvious, that Cav's achievement is a great one, but his 34 are harder won. I bet Cav would trade all of those for just one of those yellow jerseys. Personally I don't see anything tetchy or ungracious about the comments.Eddy Merckx: I won't lose any sleep if Cavendish beats my Tour de France record
The five-time Tour winner on why he admires Van der Poel, Van Aert and Pogacarwww.cyclingnews.com
And the Carcasonne finish this year just shows how tight it can be.Re Cav and Merckx, the commentators Down Under mentioned the small room for error in sprint finishes. ie, you make the slightest misjudgement and you won't win the sprint. They were of the opinion that there's more margin for error in ITTs and mountain top finishes.
Have a look at Mark Renshaw (Cav's old lead out man back in the HTC days) break down Cav's wins at this year's TdF. Fascinating. It shows how even with a good train, things can go wrong, and how with no train he can still win.What has changed in the Tour is that sprints used to be an individual exercice while now, it is a very organised team exercice and Cavendish has incredible talent but also benefits from some great team work. Mreckx did not have a "train" to follow and was competing with specialists while he was not (he was allrounder). Still, great achievement for the Cave.
It's all about timing, that ability to flick the switch at the right time. A skill just as important to understand in a summit finish as a sprint finish. Even more so as there are other factors at play, as we saw yesterday.Re Cav and Merckx, the commentators Down Under mentioned the small room for error in sprint finishes. ie, you make the slightest misjudgement and you won't win the sprint. They were of the opinion that there's more margin for error in ITTs and mountain top finishes.
I believe what Robbie McEwen was alluding to is that in a sprint finish there are many more variables to contend with, and with no chance to make amends.It's all about timing, that ability to flick the switch at the right time. A skill just as important to understand in a summit finish as a sprint finish. Even more so as there are other factors at play, as we saw yesterday.
Have a look at Mark Renshaw (Cav's old lead out man back in the HTC days) break down Cav's wins at this year's TdF. Fascinating. It shows how even with a good train, things can go wrong, and how with no train he can still win.
Login • Instagram
Welcome back to Instagram. Sign in to check out what your friends, family & interests have been capturing & sharing around the world.www.instagram.com