- Location
- Manchester
OK, we'll just have to silently take in the full import of the rhetorical questionI guess to discuss that would be political.
OK, we'll just have to silently take in the full import of the rhetorical questionI guess to discuss that would be political.
Not sure about official communication but it was widely discussed at the time as I recall.Unless I missed it there was no communication whatever to the public that this was the intention and that we should stop all precautions. It seems to me that frankness with the population is not always a bad thing, though it is perfectly understandable for people not to wish to contract what can be a pretty nasty illness with possible long term effects.
If we continue to monger scare, maybe the increase will not happen in the autumn either, and it will be "mission acomplished".In effect, all the scare mongering served to defeat the whole purpose of the relaxation ie to have an increase now rather than in the autumn.
It was, but only a relatively small minority will be engaged by such discussions.Not sure about official communication but it was widely discussed at the time as I recall.
... just like last year? ... given the very limited understanding of this virus, this is a pretty irresponsible strategy... a similar case could have been made to delay the current wave so that we get the low tide in Winter. Given the random mutations of the virus... purposefully elevating the number of cases in order to manage the pandemy 6 months down the lane looks like foolhardiness to me.In effect, all the scare mongering served to defeat the whole purpose of the relaxation ie to have an increase now rather than in the autumn.
Yes, but I'm not sure you and I are thinking the same way on what the madness was.When we look back at this period in the future, I firmly believe we will look at the Covid reaction as an act of collective madness.
Yes, but I'm not sure you and I are thinking the same way on what the madness was.
Not sure about the nobody really knows comment. Israel gained priority access to the vaccines in the first place because it agreed to share data from the program. That data is now showing pretty clearly that vaccine effectiveness drops meaningfully about 8 months post the 2nd jab. Hence, the problems in Israel compared to here since most people here still have a few months until they hit that 8 month point. That finding is what is driving western countries this week to announce booster programmes to be administered in q3/4. The UK data also released this week still showed strong protection from the vaccines vs delta which is the most important point. Net, net, if boosters maintain that level of protection we should avoid the Israeli situation.If we continue to monger scare, maybe the increase will not happen in the autumn either, and it will be "mission acomplished".
I do begin to wonder what the end game will be like though. As was pointed out in the Zoe video I posted earlier today, case rates AND death rates are now soaring in Israel, possibly because they were quick off the mark with vaccination, and used too short an interval between vaccinations, so the vaccination immunity is now wearing off - nobody really knows.
Not sure about the nobody really knows comment. Israel gained priority access to the vaccines in the first place because it agreed to share data from the program. That data is now showing pretty clearly that vaccine effectiveness drops meaningfully about 8 months post the 2nd jab. Hence, the problems in Israel compared to here since most people here still have a few months until they hit that 8 month point. That finding is what is driving western countries this week to announce booster programmes to be administered in q3/4. The UK data also released this week still showed strong protection from the vaccines vs delta which is the most important point. Net, net, if boosters maintain that level of protection we should avoid the Israeli situation.
I used that phrase, because it is currently a unique situation. Obviously behaviour is also going to influence the number of cases. I agree that the scenario you describe seems to be the likely situation, but there is a lot that remains to be learned about the waning of immunity from different vaccines and vaccination intervals. We simply don't have enough experience yet, though it is beginning to emmerge.Not sure about the nobody really knows comment.
Yeah, whatever happened to the idea that we could get out vaccine tweaked for a new variant within a 2(?) weeks? I always thought is sounded optimistic, but it depends what exactly that 2 weeks covers - maybe just the research aspect? Nevertheless I had hoped that by now we would have been for some weeks putting vaccine targetted on the delta variant into people's arms.Version 2 and 3 of the vaccines I remain hopeful for, though the last AZ tweak I saw getting tested / produced was to help counter the Beta version. I fear things have already moved on and they need to be ahead of the game.
Was that mRNA vaccine, or traditional?Yeah, whatever happened to the idea that we could get out vaccine tweaked for a new variant within a 2(?) weeks? I always thought is sounded optimistic, but it depends what exactly that 2 weeks covers - maybe just the research aspect? Nevertheless I had hoped that by now we would have been for some weeks putting vaccine targetted on the delta variant into people's arms.
I think, both but mRNA is easier - and cannot remember the precise times that were claimed.Was that mRNA vaccine, or traditional?
From memory they can produce a tweaked vaccine in under two weeks. Production takes time as a batch typically took around 100 days which they already have reduced to around 60 days. There was talk of creating a huge library of vaccines based on COVID variant DNA, they could pull from the shelf and ramp up production quickly. This is part of the Darlington facility and the Uk production which was due to be up and running mid - late summer.I think, both but mRNA is easier - and cannot remember the precise times that were claimed.
Vaccines recently used in the UK have in any case been mainly Pfizer
So by "produce a tweaked vaccine" you mean develop in the lab presumably? And test in the lab too? And must it undergo clinical trials?From memory they can produce a tweaked vaccine in under two weeks. Production takes time as a batch typically took around 100 days which they already have reduced to around 60 days
No clinical trials as it’s a modification not a brand new drug. So theoretically it can be done and out to manufacturing in 2 weeks.So by "produce a tweaked vaccine" you mean develop in the lab presumably? And test in the lab too? And must it undergo clinical trials?
Sorry - lots of questions - I don't expect you to answer them all. I'm just wondering to myself if the time to get a vaccine out explains why we don't have one targetted at delta. Or did we just consider that the one we had was good enough.
So allowing (say) a couple of months to manufacture batches, we could have been rolling out a delta-targetted vaccine by now. I think it was clear delta would be a problem before mid-June wasn't it?No clinical trials as it’s a modification not a brand new drug. So theoretically it can be done and out to manufacturing in 2 weeks.
It says the jury is out, covid infection may give one a broader kind of protection as it's not just focused on the spike, but that: "There is clear evidence that adults who have not had any vaccine dose will have stronger immune defences if they do get vaccinated, even if they have caught Covid before."Definitely worth reading...
Covid: What’s the best way to top up our immunity?
Now we have some protection, do we need to keep boosting or can nature take its course?www.bbc.co.uk
I am not saying what weight it should be given, but in addition to the points made in the article, in a longer term cost-benefit analysis, after things have settled down a bit, we should also consider the costs of a succession of minor illnesses, both in terms of human discomfort/suffering and days off work.Definitely worth reading...
Covid: What’s the best way to top up our immunity?
Now we have some protection, do we need to keep boosting or can nature take its course?www.bbc.co.uk
Yes about 3 months from start to the first batch getting injected. (I believe they have very limited trials while production occurs) The latest article I saw the other day suggested that given variants move so quickly that actually by the time it was produced then rolled out we would be looking at the next variant.So allowing (say) a couple of months to manufacture batches, we could have been rolling out a delta-targetted vaccine by now. I think it was clear delta would be a problem before mid-June wasn't it?
In general that could well be the case, but when the strain is particularly infectious (like delta) it is likely to stay dominant - until one even more infectious comes along.The latest article I saw the other day suggested that given variants move so quickly that actually by the time it was produced then rolled out we would be looking at the next variant.
Steve,In general that could well be the case, but when the strain is particularly infectious (like delta) it is likely to stay dominant - until one even more infectious comes along.
I suppose another reason for not targeting delta is that the immunity it confers to those infected by it might offer protection against the more deadly beta variant.